Articles Posted in Product Liability

Published on:

General Motors recalled 1.5 million vehicles this week as part of an effort to assure consumers that the company is moving more quickly to correct safety defects in its vehicles. CEO Mary Barra said in a video message to employees posted on Monday that the new recall occurred because there was a push to review potential safety problems and fix them faster. The fallout from the recall last month of more than 1.6 million small automobiles for faulty engine switches undoubtedly played a role in this most recent recall. The defective engine switches have been tied to twelve deaths, and GM is facing numerous investigations into its handling of the recall.

GM first began its investigations into the engine switches in 2004. Barra reported that “something went wrong with our process in this instance, and terrible things happened.” GM is undergoing an “intense review” of its recall process, and that system will be altered. During the course of the investigations, GM intends to fully cooperate with government investigators. The company expects to spend around $300 million in the first quarter to fix the vehicles affected by the new recalls as well as the vehicles covered by the small car recall. Editorial director for Kelley Blue Book, Jack Nerad, stated it is better for GM to address the new calls now rather than waiting until the investigations into the engine switches are completed.

The recalls announced Monday include 1.18 million SUVs due to air bag and seat belt pretensioner defects, 303,000 Chevrolet Express and GMC Savana vans due to an instrument panel issue, and 63,900 Cadillac XTS sedans due to a defect in a plug in the brake assembly. Numerous complaints have been made to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration concerning the vehicles subject to the recall, including injuries sustained when air bags did not deploy after a 2012 Buick Enclave traveling 45 mph was hit in the side. Drivers who file complaints with the NHTSA do not necessarily report the incidents to the car companies. Important to note in regard to the complaints and the overall recall is that air bags may not deploy in low-speed crashes or if they detect a small person seated too close to the air bag.

Another GM recall: 1.18M SUVs for air bag issue www.palmbeachpost.com March 17, 2014

Continue reading

Published on:

A faulty ignition switch has led General Motors to recall nearly 780,000 older-model compact cars in North America. The switch can shut off the engine without warning and cause dangerous accidents. According to GM, six people have died in twenty-two crashes tied to the ignition switch problem in Chevrolet Cobalts from the 2005-2007 model years and Pontiac G5s from the 2007 model year. The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration released statements and documents yesterday that revealed that a heavy key ring or jarring from rough roads can push the ignition switch out of the run position and cut off the engine and electrical power. If that occurs, the front air bags may not deploy if there is a crash.

The six fatalities reported as a result of the ignition switch defect occurred in five front-end collisions, all of which took place off-road and at high speeds. In each instance, the engine and electrical power stopped turned off when the ignition switch moved out of the run position. Spokesman Alan Adler stated that when the engine and electrical power stop while someone is driving, power-steering assist and power-assisted brakes also stop working. Alcohol was involved in three of the deaths, and in some of the crashes the occupants of the cars were not wearing seat belts.

GM dealers will replace the ignition switch at no cost, but the timing of the recall has not yet been determined. Until the defect is corrected, GM is urging owners of effected cars to remove nonessential items from key rings. One owner of a 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt complained to the NHTSA last July that the engine in his vehicle turned off on several occasions. Karl Brauer, senior analyst at Kelley Blue Book, stated that GM has improved the quality of its vehicles in the years since the recalled cars were manufactured; however, he went on to say that “this is another example of how potential engineering flaws from the past can come back to bit an automaker.” Adler stated that the ignition switch defect was discovered when the company received reports of crashes where the air bags did not inflate. According to the documents filed with the NHTSA, GM knew of this issue as early as May 2013.

GM recalling nearly 780,000 older compact cars www.palmbeachpost.com February 13, 2014

Continue reading

Published on:

Toyota Motor Corp. has instructed North American automobile dealers to cease selling six popular models that come equipped with heated seats because the fabric is not in compliance with U.S. safety codes and could potentially result in fire. Toyota spokesman John Hanson says the order affects 36,000 cars, trucks, and minivans, which is approximately thirteen percent of the inventory on dealer lots located in the U.S. Additional vehicles in Mexico, Canada, Israel, Korea, and other countries will be affected; however, the total number of affected vehicles in these countries has not yet been determined.

Hanson stated that no fires or injuries have been reported to Toyota, but Toyota is forbidden from selling vehicles that do not comply with U.S. safety codes. Dealers must refrain from selling the following 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles that come equipped with heated seats: Avalon, Tacoma, Sienna, and Camry, which is the top-selling automobile in the U.S., with more than 408,000 sold last year. Additionally, dealers cannot sell 2014 model year Corollas and Tundras that have the heated seats. All of the affected vehicles were manufactured in U.S. factories. Some of the vehicles were transported to South Korea, which is where the individual fabrics that make up the heated seat were tested and the problem was discovered. U.S. safety codes require fabrics resist fire at a certain rate; one of the fabrics located beneath the seat covers did not meet that standard. It is unclear how long repairs will take, but replacement material is being produced and installed at Toyota factories. Car dealers will be able to use the replacement material to repair the cars already located on their lots.

Toyota asserts that a recall is not necessary for vehicles with the heated seats that are already on the road because there have been no reports of fires or injuries. The company is in talks with the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration about declaring the problem “inconsequential” to vehicle safety. The NHTSA is currently monitoring the risk posed by the heated seats and will receive public comment on Toyota’s petition. If the NHTSA grants the petition, there will be no recall of vehicles already on the road. The owner of a North Palm Beach dealership that sells Avalon full-size cars states that he can only sell a few of the thirty Avalon cars he has because the majority already have the heated leather seats. Other models, like the Camry for instance, are not as affected by this issue because they are typically sold with unheated cloth seats. The issue has seemingly arisen at the worst possible time, considering that most of the country has been dealing with record-setting low temperatures.

Toyota tells dealers to stop selling 6 models www.palmbeachpost.com January 30, 2013

Continue reading

Published on:

Last week the government proposed new regulations that would require child car seats to protect children from injury and death in side-impact crashes. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s proposed regulations would increase standards for child car seats for children weighing up to forty pounds by adding new tests that simulate side-impact automobile collisions. The NHTSA estimates that the new tests will prevent the deaths of approximately five children and injuries to about sixty-four others per year. NHTSA Acting Administrator David Friedman was quoted as stating, “Car seats are an essential tool for keeping young children safe in vehicles, and they have a proven track record of saving lives.”

The new proposed tests will simulate what is commonly known as a “T-bone” crash, where the front of a vehicle driving 30 mph will hit the side of a small passenger car driving 15 mph. Friedman said that testing the vehicles at “these speeds will cover over 90 percent of the side-impact crashes seen in the real world.” NHTSA officials reported that the tests will place the car seat on a sled and will have another sled strike the sled with the car seat, which will ensure that the car seats and not the vehicles themselves are being tested. The test will use not only an already approved twelve-month-old child dummy, but will add a three-year-old dummy.

Congress passed a transportation law in 2012, which requires that the NHTSA issue new regulations concerning car seats by later this year. However, NHTSA reports that it has been working on improving side-impact collision standards for years now. Some manufacturers have already taken steps to improve the protection afforded by their car seats in side-impact collisions. A spokeswoman for the Dorel Juvenile Group stated that the company has, since 2009, been adding small, already-inflated air bags into some of their car seat models to protect children’s heads in the event of a side-impact crash. The public will now have ninety days to provide commentary on the NHTSA proposal. The regulations will not be officially put in place until the agency has time to review the comments and respond to any pressing issues, which could take months or even years.

New rules sought to make child car seats safer www.palmbeachpost.com January 22, 2013

Continue reading

Published on:

An Indiana family is suing a parasailing company that provided equipment to their daughter in Panama City Beach last summer. The daughter, seventeen-year-old Alexis Fairchild, suffered serious injuries on July 1, 2013, when the rope that was tethering her and her friend, Sidney Good, to a boat snapped. After the rope snapped, strong winds grabbed hold of the teenage girls and slammed them into a condominium building, a power line, and a parked car.

According to the Coast Guard, the major factors in the incident were the boat’s closeness to shore and severe weather conditions. Court records reveal that an attorney for Fairchild’s parents, of Huntington, Indiana, filed the negligence lawsuit last week against Aquatic Adventures Management Group in Bay County circuit court. Fairchild’s family is seeking more than $15,000 in the lawsuit. Aquatic Adventures has not released a statement concerning the suit at this time.

Indiana girl’s family sues parasailing company www.miamiherald.com January 22, 2013

Continue reading

Published on:

New crash tests performed by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety revealed that subcompact cars may not be very safe. The IIHS tested twelve of these “minicars” and none received the highest rating of “good.” The Chevrolet Spark earned the second-highest rating, “acceptable.” Six of the other subcompact cars that were tested were rated “poor.” The Nissan Versa, the best-selling subcompact car, was among the cars to receive the “poor” rating. All of the cars tested were model years 2013 or 2014.

Joe Nolan, IIHS’s senior vice president for vehicle research stated, “Small, lightweight vehicles have an inherent safety disadvantage. That’s why it’s even more important to choose one with the best occupant protection.” The subcompact cars were tested in the IIHS’s small overlap test, which was developed two years ago. The test simulates what occurs when an automobile’s front corner hits another car or something like a utility pole. During the test, twenty-five percent of the vehicle’s front end on the driver’s side hits a sturdy barrier traveling at 40 mph. The federal government’s frontal crash test, on the other hand, has a car hit a sturdy barrier head-on traveling at 35 mph. The IIHS commented on its own test, stating that striking only part of the front end makes it more difficult for vehicles to manage the energy created by a crash. A number of the subcompacts’ structures collapsed upon impact, which, in the real world, could lead to worse injuries because the seats, air bags, and other components get pushed out of place.

IIHS stated that the Honda Fit was one of the poorest performers in regards to potential driver injuries. When the Honda Fit was tested, the steering column moved so far into the car that the dummy’s head slid off the air bag and slammed into the instrument panel. Honda responded to the test results by stating that the 2015 Fit, which will go on sale in a few months, should earn a top rating on the IIHS’s small offset test. The current Fit has received top ratings in the IIHS’s four other tests. Another one of the poorest performers, the Fiat 500, fell apart during the test when the crash impact ripped the door hinges off the car. The Fiat, similar to the Fit, has received top ratings in the other tests. The other cars that received poor ratings were the Mitsubishi Mirage, Hyundai Accent, and Toyota Prius C. Cars that earned “marginal” ratings were the Mazda2, Ford Fiesta, Toyota Yaris, and Kia Rio.

Subcompact cars fare poorly in new crash tests www.palmbeachpost.com January 22, 2013

Continue reading

Published on:

Ford Motor Co. has issued a recall in the U.S. for nearly 28,000 Edge crossover vehicles due to a possibility of the damper in the fuel line cracking and causing fuel leaks. The recall involves the 2012 and 2013 models of the Ford Edge with 2.0-liter engines. All of the vehicles subject to the recall were manufactured between September 2010 and April 2013.

According to Ford, an improper production process could cause cracks in the damper, which in turn could result in fuel odor or leakage. When fuel leaks, the vehicle can catch on fire. Ford became aware of the issue with the Edge vehicles through warranty claims. Ford has not received any reports of fires or injuries related to cracks in the fuel line. Owners of affected vehicles will be notified next month and Ford dealers will make the necessary repairs at no charge to owners.

Ford recalls 27,933 Edge crossovers, www.palmbeachpost.com January 15, 2013

Continue reading

Published on:

Union Carbide Corporation, the defendant in an asbestos case, has just a few weeks to file a motion requesting the Mississippi Supreme Court review an unfavorable ruling in its case. On December 12, the Mississippi Supreme Court overruled a trial judge’s decision to throw out a $3.85 million judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, the family of Larry Smith. Smith died in 2002 of lung cancer. In the lawsuit, Smith’s wife argued that her husband was exposed to asbestos that was in drilling additives made by Union Carbide.

The Smith County trial judge stated that the plaintiffs did not prove Smith had been exposed to a particular product on a regular basis in proximity to his work. In a 4-3 vote, the Mississippi Supreme Court overturned the trial judge’s decision and sent the case back down to Smith County. Union Carbide announced that it wants to file reply briefs with the Mississippi Supreme Court.

Smith was allegedly exposed to asbestos while he worked on petroleum drilling rigs from the 1960s until the early 1990s. During that time, it was customary to use chemical drilling additives comprised of asbestos. Smith died three months after he was diagnosed with lung cancer in 2002. Court records revealed that Smith was also a heavy smoker. The family filed a lawsuit against Union Carbide in March 2006. After a three-week trial in May 2009, a Smith County jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and awarded $3.85 million. Less than a year later, the trial judge discarded the verdict.

Union Carbide faces deadline to file for rehearing, www.palmbeachpost.com December 30, 2013

Continue reading

Published on:

A University of Iowa pharmaceutical lab is facing an unusual personal injury lawsuit in California that has already cost the school thousands in legal fees and will likely cost it many thousands more. The state of Iowa is paying a Los Angeles law firm around $500 per hour to fight the lawsuit that was filed in February by a pharmacist who alleges she sustained painful eye injuries after exposure to a trial drug manufactured at UI Pharmaceuticals. A state panel approved using $27,000 of the university’s money to pay the legal fees, but those fees will continue to grow, as Iowa’s motion to dismiss the claim was rejected by a California judge last week.

Cynthia Wong, the plaintiff in the lawsuit, is a clinical pharmacist who works at California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco, which is a clinical trial site for pharmaceutical products. Her job requires her to regularly unpack boxes of drugs. She alleges that on March 3, 2011, a vapor was released from one of these boxes that caused injuries to her face and eyes. UI Pharmaceuticals made the sodium chlorite that was inside the vials located in the box for Neuraltus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Sharp Corp. processed and sent the package that allegedly caused Wong’s injuries. Wong describes her injuries as corneal abrasions, which involve scratches to the cornea that can cause blurred vision, redness, tears, and inflammation. According to Wong’s attorney, Alan Zacharin, Wong still suffers eye problems nearly three years after the exposure.

Wong’s lawsuit states that she sustained injuries because of safety defects in the design, manufacture, packing, and shipment of the product. The lawsuit goes on to say that the package should have come with instructions and warnings about the possibility for injuries so that Wong could have made “an intelligent decision regarding whether to unpack” the box. Wong’s injuries have allegedly caused her to incur medical expenses, miss work, and suffer a diminished earning capacity. She named UI Pharmaceuticals, Neuraltus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sharp Corp. as defendants. The state of Iowa is incurring costs for UI Pharmaceuticals’ defense because UI Pharmaceuticals is a state entity.

U Iowa drug lab faces injury lawsuit in California, www.palmbeachpost.com December 31, 2013

Continue reading

Published on:

Honda Motor Co. topped the insurance industry’s list of safest new cars this year. Earlier this month, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety awarded thirty-nine vehicles top safety ratings for the coming year. The number is down quite a bit from last year’s one-hundred-thirty vehicles that received top ratings. This drastic decrease is likely due to an increase in the standards that vehicles must reach to attain top safety ratings.

This year was the first time that cars needed to get top crash test scores and a good front crash prevention system rating to top the IIHS’s list. The IIHS rates a front crash prevention system as good for having things such as automatic braking or warning systems. Cars are now given a status of “Top Safety Pick” or “Top Safety Pick +,” if the front crash protection criteria is also met.

Honda had eight of its vehicles make the top safety list, including the Honda Civic hybrid, Honda Civic two-door, and Honda Accord. Acura, which is owned by Honda, had three cars make the list as well–Acura RLX, Acura MDX, and Acura TL. Many shoppers use the list in their pursuit to find a safe vehicle and automakers use the list in their marketing and advertising strategies. The IIHS’s rankings have led many automakers in recent years to develop safer vehicles. Auto manufacturers are now working hard to ensure the front-end of their vehicles are safe enough to pass the IIHS’s offset test, which looks at how well a vehicle protects occupants when the crash covers only part of the front end.

Honda tops insurance industry safety list, www.palmbeachpost.com December 19, 2013

Continue reading

Badges
Contact Information